Phone: (847) 659-8500
11952 Oak Creek Parkway
Huntley, IL USA

Home
Dr. Sukel Biography
Office Directions
Dental Materials 
  Dental Material Philosophies
  Filling Materials
  Crown or Bridge Materials
  Denture Materials
  Implant Materials
  Dental Material Analysis
Sleep Dentistry

Mercury Amalgams

  IAOMT Report
  
Mercury Amalgam Links
  Mercury FAQ's
  Mercury Vapor Exposure
  Silver Fillings
    Silver Fillings Safe View
    Silver Fillings Unsafe View
Nutrition
Root Canal Treatment
  Root Canal Safe View
  Root Canal Unsafe View
Fluoride
  Fluoride Safe View
  Fluoride Unsafe View
Homeopathy
IAOMT
Suggested Reading
Related Links
 

Filling Materials

Amalgam The most commonly used material for back teeth. It contains approximately 50% mercury, and varying amounts of silver (30%), tin, zinc, and copper. It is the least costly and least time consuming to perform. It does not hold its shape over time, corrodes easily, and is expected to last 5-10 years, although I have seen it last significantly longer. The controversy is that it contains mercury, a known neurotoxin (poison to the nervous system).
Galloy A brand new material containing silver, tin, copper, indium, and gallium, meant to be mercury-free alternative to amalgam. Question: Why is the American Dental Association developing & patenting this substitute for mercury amalgam if mercury amalgam is safe?
Direct Composite A special plastic material that bonds to tooth structure, is tooth colored, is more easily repairable, and requires less tooth structure to be trimmed away than any other material. It is expected to last 5-7 years, although small to moderate size fillings may last longer. Research has shown that it reinforces the tooth and makes it stronger. Cost and time to perform is about 50-75% more than amalgam. Caution: Composites are a petrochemical derivative and, as such, are a possible problem for the environmentally sensitive.
Indirect Composite Inlay/Onlay Used when ideal anatomy, fit, and durability is desired, which is seldom achieved with a direct composite filling. Cost is approximately 2-3 times that of an amalgam filling and takes 2 visits.
Porcelain Inlay/Onlay Used when cosmetics and wear resistance is most important. It costs about the same as an indirect composite inlay/onlay and takes 2 visits. The controversy is that it contains aluminum. However, if the half-life for dissolution/corrosion is very long (e.g. 500 years), the content like aluminum may not make a difference.
Gold Inlay/Onlay Used when maximum strength is desired and appearance is not a factor. There are many formulations of gold, varying from 1% to 99%. It costs approximately 3-4 times more than an amalgam and takes 2 visits.
Titanium Inlay/Onlay Used when a gold alloy is not biocompatible, otherwise the benefits, cost, and time to perform are the same as for a gold alloy, even though it is not a precious metal. It takes 2 visits.

Many thanks to Ron King, DDS, Minneapolis, MN


Alternative dental care should be an adjunct to, not a substitute for, contemporary dental care.  Should you require further information or have questions regarding the topics discussed, please feel free to contact me at the phone number above.

Copyright 1996 - 2004 Phillip P. Sukel, DDS, Ltd.


http://www.digits.com